A principal finds that many annual plans were not implemented because action items were not completed. Which time-management action is most effective?

• A. Prioritize activities that are most directly related to the campus vision and goals
• B. Increase the number of meetings
• C. Create a new committee without a clear plan
• D. Reduce planning time to speed up decisions

Answer: (A)

Focusing time on tasks that directly advance the campus vision is the most effective way to manage time. When action items are clearly tied to the school’s goals, it’s easier to see which tasks truly move the plan forward, allocate resources where they matter, and hold people accountable for completing them. This alignment helps prevent wasted effort on low-impact activities and keeps everyone focused on what will produce measurable progress.

Why this works here: if annual plans aren’t implemented because items aren’t completed, the missing ingredient is a clear link between work and outcomes. By prioritizing activities that directly support the campus goals, the principal creates a filter for decisions and scheduling—only the tasks that push toward the vision get priority, with deadlines and accountability attached.

Why the other approaches aren’t as effective: increasing meetings often adds time without guaranteeing progress and can stall action if meetings become a substitute for real planning. Creating a new committee without a clear plan adds layers of bureaucracy and ambiguity rather than clarity. Reducing planning time can lead to rushed, incomplete decisions and vague ownership, which undermines follow-through and accountability.